Whether this coin clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Methodology breakdown (6/6 compliant)
Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Trade plan
Posted with a stop, a target and the level that invalidates it. It resolves into the public record either way.
Moonwell (WELL) is currently marked questionable - not a clean pass or a confirmed fail, per our own multi-standard crypto screen. Our full reasoning, the standards behind it and the facts it rests on are below.
🕌 In-house Compliance Research
Methodology breakdown (6/6 compliant)
Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.
How close is it to flipping?
Every current reading against its own line, closest first. A verdict is only as durable as that distance.
What changed, and when
Verdict history for WELL. Nothing has been recorded for it yet.
ℹ️ Coin verdicts are not change-tracked yet. An empty history here means nothing has been recorded, not that nothing has moved.
| Investor | Firm | Position | Weight | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azzad Asset Management | Azzad Asset Management | $9M | 0.8% | 2026-06-30 |
| Wahed Invest | Wahed Invest LLC | $4M | 0.4% | 2026-06-30 |
| Saturna Capital | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | $2M | 0.0% | 2026-06-30 |
| Ken Fisher | Fisher Asset Management | $0M | 0.0% | 2026-06-30 |
From the most recent 13F on file. A 13F reports long US equity positions quarterly and in arrears — it is what a manager held on the report date, not what they hold today.
Our Sharia Verdict
This coin carries a published verdict of questionable from our reviewed list. When we screened it a second time against the named scholarly standards, that independent route reached a different answer.
We publish the detailed breakdown only where both routes agree. A disagreement usually means our structured description of the token is wrong somewhere — that is what it has meant every time we have chased one down — so showing the breakdown would mean publishing reasoning we do not yet trust. It is queued for review.
Screened 2026-08-29. The verdict on the compliance card above still stands; it is the framework-by-framework detail that is withheld.
About Moonwell
Moonwell (WELL) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol built on the Moonbeam and Moonriver networks, enabling users to lend, borrow, and earn interest on their crypto assets. It aims to provide a user-friendly platform with robust liquidity and innovative features for the DeFi community. Source: CoinPaprika.com
Base EcosystemMoonbeam Ecosystem
Background via CoinPaprika — informational, not part of the verdict.
Latest Signal — 2026-10-01
Stop 227.12 Now 0.00 Target 232.22
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The market-structure read is still being computed — it runs in the background rather than holding this page up. Reload in a moment and it will be here.
Peer Movement
How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.
Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Why is crypto screened differently?
The ratio screen needs a balance sheet. A coin has neither filings nor a debt figure, so the same test cannot run. Compliance turns instead on what the token actually is and does.
What makes a coin non-compliant here?
Most commonly, the token is a claim on interest: a lending protocol, a yield-bearing stablecoin, or a product whose return comes from lending at interest rather than from work performed.
Is a compliant verdict permanent?
No. A protocol can add a lending product or change what its token does. Any verdict that moves is recorded, and a verdict that has not moved is reported as such rather than assumed.
Is the scholarly debate resolved?
Not on every coin. Where real disagreement exists, HTR records both positions instead of picking one. This is a research tool; a ruling for your own holding should come from a qualified scholar.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.