The questions worth asking before you trust a compliance screen or a signal — answered plainly, with links to the real data behind each answer.
No. Everything published here — signals, screening verdicts, win rates, losses — is research and transparency data, not a personalized recommendation. Trading involves real risk regardless of how a business is screened, and past signal performance is not a promise of future results. See the disclaimer at the bottom of every page before making any decision with real money.
No. A COMPLIANT verdict means a stock or coin passed a specific, published screening methodology, applied consistently and shown with its real underlying ratios — not a religious ruling from a qualified scholar. Screening reflects a methodology, not a fatwa, and isn't a substitute for your own due diligence or a scholar's guidance on your specific situation. See Methodology for exactly what is and isn't checked.
Every stock is checked against seven published methodologies — AAOIFI, Usmani, Dow Jones Islamic, S&P Shariah, MSCI, and FTSE Shariah — using financial ratios sourced directly from SEC filings (debt, non-compliant income, receivables), plus a business-activity classifier that screens out companies whose core business isn't permissible regardless of their ratios. Results are cross-checked against Halal Terminal and a secondary independent provider, so no single source is the only word. Crypto assets are reviewed individually — a coin's actual mechanism (utility token vs. interest-bearing stablecoin vs. staking reward) determines its verdict, not a blanket "crypto is/isn't halal" rule. Full breakdown: Methodology.
Signals come from a set of independent technical screeners (breakout, gap, momentum, VWAP, candlestick patterns, and others) that only ever look at symbols that already passed compliance screening — a signal can't be generated on a non-compliant stock in the first place. Every signal posts with a real stop, a real target, and is tracked to a real resolved outcome (WIN or LOSS), published on Signals and aggregated on Performance — including the signal types that are currently losing. Nothing is hidden after the fact.
Because a track record that only shows winners isn't evidence of anything. Every hypothesis this platform tests — which signal types actually have an edge, which factors predict outcomes — is registered on Research Lab before its result is known, so a question can't be quietly reworded after the fact to match whatever the data happened to show. When a strategy doesn't hold up, that gets published too.
No. Every page on this site — signals, screening results, performance history, the research registry — is free to read. There's no paywall and no paid tier gating better data behind a subscription.
No. The site itself is a read-only public dashboard — there's nothing to sign up for and no personal data to hand over just to look at it. The Discord server is where the community discusses signals in real time; joining it is optional, not required to use anything on this site.
QUESTIONABLE means a real, active scholarly disagreement exists about the specific case — not that the screen couldn't decide. NON-COMPLIANT means the business activity or financial ratios clearly fail the methodology being applied. Both verdicts show the real reasoning behind them — a screener that returns a verdict with no reason attached is asking to be trusted rather than checked.
See also: All articles · Screening Methodology · About · Is Crypto Halal? · Is Day Trading Halal? · Not financial or religious advice.
