31,651 stocks · 501 cryptocurrencies screened
Sharia Compliance
Business activity and financial ratios for stocks, hand-reviewed-then-LLM-expanded reasoning for crypto — both checked against published Islamic finance methodologies before anything reaches a signal. Pick a market below for the full, searchable breakdown.
Coverage detail — registry denominators, and the 13,907 symbols we examined but could not rate
46,044 symbols examined in total · 32,137 carry a verdict (13,907 could not be rated)
The 10,209 in-house global issuers are out of 17,011 issuers in the registry (60.0%) · 6,802 cannot be priced
765 stocks additionally flagged for deeper review by our in-house ratio engine (100.0% checked so far) — a separate signal from the provider status above. Full breakdown →
ETFs & mutual funds
18,521 funds carry a verdict from our own look-through of their filed holdings — 277 compliant. A fund is screened on its actual portfolio, not on its name or its marketing, and one whose holdings we cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than guessed at.
Where the standards disagree
Of 32,137 issuers with at least one method verified, this is how they divide. A split is not an error — it is two published standards dividing by different things and reaching different answers on the same filing.
| Unanimous passevery verified method agrees | 5,409 |
| Split, majority passmore verified methods pass than fail | 5,583 |
| Split, majority failmore verified methods fail than pass | 6,790 |
| Unanimous failevery verified method agrees | 14,355 |
12,373 of 32,137 issuers are split — the standards do not agree on them, and this site publishes all seven rather than averaging them into one label.
12,939 more issuers have no method verified at all. They are not counted above: “every method failed” and “no method could run” are different findings, and only one of them is about the company.
167 carry a compliant verdict that most of their verified methods do not support. They are surfaced here rather than quietly corrected.
Screening methodologies
Stocks are checked against seven published equity methodologies. Different standards can legitimately reach different verdicts on the same company — none is universally "correct."
Why two separate methodologies
Stocks are screened by business activity plus financial ratios sourced from SEC filings — a company either does or doesn't operate in an excluded category, and its debt/interest-bearing-asset ratios either clear or don't clear published thresholds. Crypto has no filings or balance sheet to check — compliance instead turns on what a coin's underlying mechanism actually is (a real utility token vs. an interest-bearing yield product vs. a staking/speculative asset in genuine scholarly debate). See Methodology for the full stock rules and Is Crypto Halal? for the full crypto reasoning.