Siacoin (SC) is currently marked questionable - not a clean pass or a confirmed fail, per our own multi-standard crypto screen. Our full reasoning, the standards behind it and the facts it rests on are below.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally above. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
The disagreement is about whether a share of protocol fees is payment for a service or a return on capital.
5 of 6 permit it; 1 do not. We report that as unsettled rather than picking a side for you.
Not fully corroborated, and it matters. 2 separate models read this coin and gave different answers for asset kind, return mechanism, and the difference changes the outcome: on one reading this coin comes out compliant and on another questionable. We publish the reading we hold and tell you it is contested, rather than presenting a verdict as firmer than its basis.
Not established: transparent governance. Our verdict does not assume anything about these — where they would change the answer, we say so rather than guessing.
Default permissibility and no riba. Note the Council ruled on Bitcoin specifically - applying it to a non-currency token like this one is an extension by analogy, not something the Council itself ruled.
Fiqh Council of North America, “Regarding the Islamic Ruling on Bitcoins” — default permissibility; treated as fiat currency, so all riba rulings and bai’ al-sarf apply
No clear evidence of prohibition: no riba, no impermissible underlying activity, and a real function.
Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America — Dr. Salah Al-Sawy (Secretary General) and Dr. Yasir Qadhi: transactions are permissible unless clear evidence prohibits them
This standard requires transparent governance to be established, and we could not establish it. An unestablished requirement is not a satisfied one, so this reads as unresolved rather than as a pass.
Securities Commission Malaysia, Shariah Advisory Council, 233rd-234th meetings, June-July 2020
Project, token and reward layers all pass.
Amanah Advisors, Crypto Shariah Screening Framework (Mufti Faraz Adam)
Validation and fee-sharing are compensation for a real service rendered to the network, not a return on capital — the position under which this firm certified Ethereum staking.
Amanie Advisors (Dr. Daud Bakar) — Shariah certification of Ethereum staking; validation treated as a real service rendered to the network rather than a return on capital
No interest-derived return to the holder.
AAOIFI Shariah Standards - riba and non-permissible income, applied to the token's return mechanism (no dedicated crypto standard exists)
No intrinsic backing and no issuing authority; excessive gharar under this position, which applies to most digital assets including Bitcoin.
Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani (crypto trading and investment impermissible); Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah (Egypt, 2018); Diyanet Isleri Baskanligi (Turkey, 2017)
The restrictive position above is shown but excluded from our own verdict: it rejects most digital assets including Bitcoin on gharar alone, so letting it decide would mark nearly everything non-compliant — which is neither our conclusion nor a defensible reading of the evidence. Hiding it would be worse.
This is our own screening verdict, reached by applying each named standard ourselves to the facts above, last established 2026-08-29. Research, not a fatwa — for a decision that binds you, ask a scholar you trust.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 64.90 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 65.44 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | 165.49 | SELL |
| Williams %R (14) | -34.56 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| ROC (10) | 5.59 | BUY |
| Momentum (10) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (10) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (20) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (30) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (50) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (100) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 0.00 | BUY |
| EMA (200) | 0.00 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 0.00 | BUY |
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Siacoin (SC) is the native cryptocurrency of the Sia decentralized storage platform, allowing users to rent out their unused hard drive space to others on the network. It aims to provide a secure, efficient, and cost-effective alternative to traditional cloud storage services. Source: CoinPaprika.com
PlatformSmart ContractsProof Of WorkBig Data & Data StoragePrivacy & SecurityBlakeComputing & Cloud InfrastructureCryptocurrencyMiningDePIN
Background via CoinPaprika — informational, not part of the verdict.
⚪ NOT ENOUGH DATA
Only 1 of 6 momentum inputs are available for SC, which is not enough to read a setup. This is a gap in our price history for this coin, not a judgement about it.
Scores: 0 bullish / 0 bearish
Scored without rsi, roc, rel_vol, macd, above_ma — data unavailable this render.
Exceptional confluence — high-probability setup
| Timeframe | Bias | Bars |
|---|---|---|
| 🕐 1H | BULLISH | 200 |
| ⏱ 15-Min | RANGING | 200 |
| ⏲ 5-Min | BULLISH | 200 |
Aggressive buy (inflow) vs sell (outflow) volume from the recent Binance tape, by trade size. Market context only — not a signal.
From the last 1000 aggregate trades · via Binance.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.
