Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment NUSMX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Nuveen Ultra Short Municipal Managed Accounts Portfolio · Nuveen Managed Accounts Portfolio Trust
34 holdings
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 34 holdings are companies in our screened equity universe. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not apply to a fund holding bonds, sukuk or other instruments — this is not a gap in our data about the fund.
Largest holdings: Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airports Authority, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010D, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Industrial Development Board, Tennessee, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Summit Apartments, Houston, Texas, Combined Utility System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2018C, Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance Program Bonds, Series 2016A-3, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Series 2020.
34 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-25. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airports Authority, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010D | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Industrial Development Board, Tennessee, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Summit Apartments | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Houston, Texas, Combined Utility System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2018C | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance Program Bonds, Series 2016A-3 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Series 2020 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2023B | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Loan Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2024C | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Bonds, Subordinate Fiscal 2013 Series A-4 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2017C-3 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Yale University, Series 2013A | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority, Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue Bonds, Fiscal 2014 Adjustable Rate | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Subseries G-6 Fiscal Series 2012 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| New York State Housing Finance Agency, 316 Eleventh Avenue Housing Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Demand Obligation Series 2009A | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Louisiana State, Gasoline and Fuels Tax Second Lien Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2023A-2 | UNSCREENED | 3.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina, Health Care Revenue Bonds, DBA Carolinas HealthCare System, Variable Rate Demand Series 2007 | UNSCREENED | 3.30% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Irvine Ranch Water District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009S | UNSCREENED | 3.15% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Washington University, Variable Rate Demand Obligations, Series 2000B | UNSCREENED | 3.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JEA, Florida, Water and Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Demand Obligations Series 2008A-1 & 2008A-2 | UNSCREENED | 3.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, St. Louis University, Variable Rate Demand Obligations, Series 2008B-2 | UNSCREENED | 3.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Washington State Housing Finance Commission, Single Family Program Bonds, Series 2016VR-1N | UNSCREENED | 3.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| District of Columbia, Multimodal Revenue Bonds, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Series 2010 | UNSCREENED | 3.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| CHASE SECURITIES INC. | UNSCREENED | 2.95% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Oregon State, General Obligation Bonds, Veteran's Welfare Series 110 Series 2022E | UNSCREENED | 2.90% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Texas State, General Obligation Veterans Bonds, Series 2020 | UNSCREENED | 2.90% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Multi-Modal Subordinated Series 2025D | UNSCREENED | 2.80% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Eastern Municipal Water District, California, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2018A | UNSCREENED | 2.70% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Boulder Community Hospital Project, Variable Rate Demand Obligations Series 2000 | UNSCREENED | 2.60% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| MERRILL LYNCH,PIERCE,FENNER&SMITH, SUSQUEHANNA | UNSCREENED | 2.50% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Loudoun County Industrial Development Authority, Virginia, Revenue Bonds, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Variable Rate Demand Obligations, Series 20 | UNSCREENED | 2.50% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Johns Hopkins Health System, Series 2024B | UNSCREENED | 2.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Texas Children's Hospital, Series 2015-3 | UNSCREENED | 2.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Varibale Rate Demand Obligations, Series 2015C | UNSCREENED | 1.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Loudoun County Industrial Development Authority, Virginia, Revenue Bonds, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Variable Rate Demand Obligations Series 200 | UNSCREENED | 1.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airports Authority, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010Dnot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Industrial Development Board, Tennessee, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Summit Apartmentsnot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Houston, Texas, Combined Utility System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2018Cnot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance Program Bonds, Series 2016A-3not matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Variable Rate Series 2020not matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2023Bnot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Loan Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2024Cnot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Bonds, Subordinate Fiscal 2013 Series A-4not matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2017C-3not matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
| Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Yale University, Series 2013Anot matched to a ticker | 3.35% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 34 holdings, 33.5% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
Verdict history for NUSMX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 5 days - this is not a reading of today
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 100.00 | SELL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 100.00 | SELL |
| CCI (20) | 37.62 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | 0.00 | SELL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | -0.00 | SELL |
| ROC (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Momentum (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (10) | 10.00 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 10.00 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (20) | 9.99 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 9.99 | BUY |
| EMA (30) | 9.99 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 9.99 | BUY |
| EMA (50) | 9.98 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 9.98 | BUY |
| EMA (100) | 9.95 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 9.95 | BUY |
| EMA (200) | 9.91 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 9.91 | BUY |
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.