Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment NIHI's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF ETF · NEOS ETF Trust
4 holdings · as of 2026-06-30 (3.4 months ago) The fund may have traded since. SEC Form N-PORT is filed quarterly and lags the period it covers, so these are the most recent holdings on file, not the fund’s holdings today.
This fund holds short positions, so exposure is counted gross — long and short both count as exposure rather than netting off, and the weights below therefore sum to 101% of net assets rather than 100%. Shares of the portfolio are shown as shares of that gross exposure.
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 4 holdings matched a company in our screened universe. It does file equity positions — the shortfall is in our matching, not in the fund, and it can close on a later screen. Usually this is foreign listings or naming we have not yet resolved.
Largest holdings: iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, First American Treasury Obliga, N/A, N/A.
4 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-25. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | UNSCREENED | 98.38% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| First American Treasury Obliga | UNSCREENED | 1.94% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.20% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.08% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Methodology breakdown computing — it will appear here on its own.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
The factors behind the read, each shown with the figure it rests on, including the ones pointing the other way.
Still fetching analyst coverage — it ran past this page's budget, so the page painted without waiting. The fetch is still running; reload in a moment and it will be here.
Computing the full ratio and business-activity breakdown for NIHI — this runs off the critical path so the page paints first. It will appear here on its own.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 42.60 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 26.09 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | -90.65 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -73.91 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | -0.07 | SELL |
| ROC (10) | -1.78 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.92 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 50.93 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 50.91 | SELL |
| EMA (20) | 51.21 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 51.27 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 51.35 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 51.59 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 51.35 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 51.81 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 50.80 | SELL |
| SMA (100) | 50.94 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 49.48 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 49.56 | BUY |
Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of companies included in the international index. The fund executes this portion of the strategy by investing in one or more international Underlying ETFs and/or a portfolio of stocks that make up the international index.
Background via Yahoo Finance — informational, not part of the verdict.
Average — needs more confirmation before sizing up
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
| Timeframe | Bias | Bars |
|---|---|---|
| 📅 Daily | BEARISH | 42 |
| ⏰ 4H | BEARISH | 23 |
| 🕐 1H | RANGING | 95 |
| ⏱ 15-Min | BULLISH | 130 |
| ⏲ 5-Min | BULLISH | 234 |
Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.
How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.
Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Insider transactions reported in the last ninety days. Insiders sell for reasons that have nothing to do with a view, so a sale on its own is not a signal.
NO DATA 0 buys · 0 sells
The weekly CFTC Commitments of Traders report for the broad market it tracks, not for this symbol. Positioning context for the tape — it says nothing about this company.
NEUTRAL report date 2026-10-06 · Asset managers net 906615 (+2612)
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.