Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment NEITX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Nebraska Municipal Fund · Viking Mutual Funds
44 holdings
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 44 holdings are companies in our screened equity universe. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not apply to a fund holding bonds, sukuk or other instruments — this is not a gap in our data about the fund.
Largest holdings: Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.700% 9/1/2049, Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.500% 9/1/2044, Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2031, Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2046, Nebraska State Colleges 5.000% 7/1/2048.
44 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-24. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.700% 9/1/2049 | UNSCREENED | 7.55% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.500% 9/1/2044 | UNSCREENED | 7.50% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2031 | UNSCREENED | 4.16% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2046 | UNSCREENED | 4.09% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Nebraska State Colleges 5.000% 7/1/2048 | UNSCREENED | 3.92% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Southeast Community College Area 5.000% 12/15/2048 | UNSCREENED | 3.92% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Otoe County School District No 501 4.500% 12/15/2043 | UNSCREENED | 3.88% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Otoe County School District No 501 4.750% 12/15/2047 | UNSCREENED | 3.86% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Custer Public Power District 4.125% 6/1/2039 | UNSCREENED | 3.79% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Omaha NE Riverfront Redevelopment 4.000% 4/15/2049 | UNSCREENED | 3.48% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Bellevue NE 4.000% 9/15/2049 | UNSCREENED | 3.32% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fremont School District No 1 5.000% 12/15/2048 | UNSCREENED | 2.92% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| County of Hall NE 4.000% 12/15/2044 | UNSCREENED | 2.87% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fremont School District No 1 5.000% 12/15/2043 | UNSCREENED | 2.74% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| County of Butler NE 5.000% 12/1/2043 | UNSCREENED | 2.33% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| York County School District No 96 4.000% 12/15/2044 | UNSCREENED | 2.26% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fillmore County School District No 25 5.000% 6/15/2038 | UNSCREENED | 2.22% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Nebraska City NE 5.000% 7/15/2038 | UNSCREENED | 2.09% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Papillion-La Vista School District No 27 5.000% 12/1/2042 | UNSCREENED | 2.08% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of David City NE Electric Utility 4.550% 12/15/2034 | UNSCREENED | 2.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Fremont NE 5.000% 12/15/2029 | UNSCREENED | 2.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of McCook NE 5.000% 9/1/2040 | UNSCREENED | 2.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Henderson NE 5.100% 12/15/2038 | UNSCREENED | 1.89% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Broken Bow Public Schools 4.000% 12/15/2044 | UNSCREENED | 1.79% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Nance County School District No 30 4.000% 12/15/2044 | UNSCREENED | 1.79% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Henderson NE 4.850% 12/15/2036 | UNSCREENED | 1.73% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Nance County School District No 30 4.125% 12/15/2049 | UNSCREENED | 1.72% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fremont School District No 1 5.250% 12/15/2046 | UNSCREENED | 1.61% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Douglas County Sanitary & Improvement District 5.000% 11/15/2046 | UNSCREENED | 1.41% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Westside Community Schools 4.375% 12/1/2043 | UNSCREENED | 1.36% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fremont School District No 1 5.250% 12/15/2045 | UNSCREENED | 1.23% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Wahoo NE 4.750% 12/15/2033 | UNSCREENED | 1.23% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of McCook NE 5.000% 9/1/2039 | UNSCREENED | 1.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Nebraska City NE 4.000% 1/15/2036 | UNSCREENED | 0.98% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.550% 9/1/2044 | UNSCREENED | 0.96% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fremont School District No 1 5.250% 12/15/2044 | UNSCREENED | 0.87% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Pierce Public Schools - District No 70-0002 5.000% 1/15/2030 | UNSCREENED | 0.81% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of North Platte NE 5.000% 12/15/2035 | UNSCREENED | 0.80% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Henderson NE 4.600% 12/15/2034 | UNSCREENED | 0.79% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Nebraska City NE 4.350% 1/15/2039 | UNSCREENED | 0.77% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Hartington NE 4.500% 12/15/2040 | UNSCREENED | 0.74% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Pierce Public Schools - District No 70-0002 5.000% 1/15/2029 | UNSCREENED | 0.60% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of David City NE Electric Utility 4.400% 12/15/2029 | UNSCREENED | 0.52% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| City of Nebraska City NE 4.150% 7/15/2033 | UNSCREENED | 0.38% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.700% 9/1/2049not matched to a ticker | 7.55% | Not screened |
| Nebraska Investment Finance Authority 4.500% 9/1/2044not matched to a ticker | 7.50% | Not screened |
| Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2031not matched to a ticker | 4.16% | Not screened |
| Omaha Public Power District 5.000% 2/1/2046not matched to a ticker | 4.09% | Not screened |
| Nebraska State Colleges 5.000% 7/1/2048not matched to a ticker | 3.92% | Not screened |
| Southeast Community College Area 5.000% 12/15/2048not matched to a ticker | 3.92% | Not screened |
| Otoe County School District No 501 4.500% 12/15/2043not matched to a ticker | 3.88% | Not screened |
| Otoe County School District No 501 4.750% 12/15/2047not matched to a ticker | 3.86% | Not screened |
| Custer Public Power District 4.125% 6/1/2039not matched to a ticker | 3.79% | Not screened |
| City of Omaha NE Riverfront Redevelopment 4.000% 4/15/2049not matched to a ticker | 3.48% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 44 holdings, 46.1% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
Verdict history for NEITX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 3 days - this is not a reading of today
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.10 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 26.48 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | -54.57 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -73.52 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.00 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | -0.73 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.06 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 8.56 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 8.53 | BUY |
| EMA (20) | 8.63 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 8.64 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 8.70 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 8.73 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 8.79 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 8.85 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 8.90 | SELL |
| SMA (100) | 8.99 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 8.94 | SELL |
| SMA (200) | 9.01 | SELL |
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.