Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment MSCXX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
NYLIM Money Market Fund
31 holdings
UNVERIFIED This is a money market fund. It files its portfolio on Form N-MFP rather than N-PORT, and holds short-term instruments — commercial paper, certificates of deposit, treasury bills, repurchase agreements — rather than company shares. Its 31 positions are listed below as filed. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not produce a verdict here.
31 positions. Source: SEC Form N-MFP.
0.04% of this portfolio’s income is non-permissible — weighted across holdings, computed over 4% of portfolio weight (4 of 31 holdings). The common approach purifies that proportion of income received — dividends — not of the position’s value. We report the ratio; what to do with it is a question for your own scholar.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bills | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.16% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BofA Securities, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.14% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| U.S. Treasury Bills | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.06% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.06% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| U.S. Treasury Bills | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| RBC Capital Markets LLC | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BMO Capital Markets | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| TD Securities, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BNP.PA BNP Paribas SA | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.04% | AAOIFIfail Usmanifail Dow Jones Islamicfail S&P Shariahfail MSCI Islamicfail MSCI Islamic M-Seriesfail FTSE Shariahfail |
| Natixis SA | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Toyota Motor Credit Corp. | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Hydro-Quebec | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| John Deere Financial, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Province of Alberta Canada | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| NDA-FI.HE Nordea Bank Abp | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.02% | AAOIFIfail Usmanifail Dow Jones Islamicfail S&P Shariahfail MSCI Islamicfail MSCI Islamic M-Seriesfail FTSE Shariahfail |
| Province of Alberta Canada | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Henkel of America, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| SNY Sanofi SA | COMPLIANT | 0.02% | AAOIFI20.8% Usmani14.7% Dow Jones Islamic38.1% S&P Shariah38.6% MSCI Islamic14.7% MSCI Islamic M-Series38.6% FTSE Shariah14.7% |
| TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Henkel of America, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| U.S. Treasury Bills | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| U.S. Treasury Bills | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| WMT Walmart, Inc. | QUESTIONABLE | 0.01% | AAOIFI6.4% Usmani21.5% Dow Jones Islamic6.9% S&P Shariah8.0% MSCI Islamic19.2% MSCI Islamic M-Series8.0% FTSE Shariah13.6% |
| HD Home Depot, Inc. (The) | COMPLIANT | 0.01% | AAOIFI18.6% Usmani56.1% Dow Jones Islamic16.3% S&P Shariah17.0% MSCI Islamic53.3% MSCI Islamic M-Series17.0% FTSE Shariah44.5% |
| L'Oreal USA, Inc. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Henkel Corp. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| WMT Walmart, Inc. | QUESTIONABLE | 0.01% | AAOIFI6.4% Usmani21.5% Dow Jones Islamic6.9% S&P Shariah8.0% MSCI Islamic19.2% MSCI Islamic M-Series8.0% FTSE Shariah13.6% |
| Province of Alberta Canada | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Toyota Motor Credit Corp. | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
All 7 published standards agree about this fund to within 0.0 points of portfolio weight.
These bars are the financial-ratio result under each standard — debt, receivables and interest income. They do not screen what the business does, so a holding can pass every ratio here and still be questionable or non-compliant on activity. The blended verdict above accounts for both.
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under AAOIFI
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under Usmani
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under Dow Jones Islamic
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under S&P Shariah
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under MSCI Islamic
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under MSCI Islamic M-Series
ratios pass on 0.0% ratios fail on 0.1% 0.9% not rated under FTSE Shariah
5 of 31 listed holdings carry our own per-methodology verdicts (0% of weight). The rest hold a provider verdict with no methodology breakdown, and are counted as rated by none. Of those, 3 (0% of weight) also carry the underlying debt ratio; the rest show a verdict without the figure behind it.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Billsnot matched to a ticker | 0.16% | Non-compliant |
| BofA Securities, Inc.not matched to a ticker | 0.14% | Not screened |
| U.S. Treasury Billsnot matched to a ticker | 0.06% | Non-compliant |
| Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.not matched to a ticker | 0.06% | Not screened |
| U.S. Treasury Billsnot matched to a ticker | 0.05% | Non-compliant |
| RBC Capital Markets LLCnot matched to a ticker | 0.04% | Not screened |
| BMO Capital Marketsnot matched to a ticker | 0.04% | Not screened |
| TD Securities, Inc.not matched to a ticker | 0.04% | Not screened |
| Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Banknot matched to a ticker | 0.04% | Not screened |
| BNP.PABNP Paribas SA | 0.04% | Non-compliant |
Top 10 of 31 holdings, 0.7% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
Verdict history for MSCXX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 4 days - this is not a reading of today
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.