Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment MLECE.PA's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this company clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
MLECE.PA is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per In-house ratio engine. See the full ratio breakdown and business-activity screen below for the reasoning.
⚠️ Financial ratios are only half the screen. A company whose core business is in an excluded sector — weapons/defense, alcohol, gambling, conventional (interest-based) finance, tobacco, pork, or adult entertainment — is non-compliant even if every debt and income ratio passes. So passing ratios below don't override this verdict; check the business-activity screen for the reason.
51 other Real Estate stocks pass this same screen. See compliant Real Estate stocks →
Computed from published company financials, balance sheet as of 2025-12-31. MLECE.PA files no SEC reports, so these ratios come from the issuer's own published statements rather than XBRL.
Business activity: cleared (no excluded categories detected)
| Ratio | Value | Threshold | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing debt | 224.42% | 30.00% | Fail |
| Interest-bearing investments | 5.09% | 30.00% | Pass |
| Ratio | Value | Threshold | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing debt | 64.05% | 33.00% | Fail |
| Interest-bearing investments | 1.45% | 33.00% | Pass |
| Non-liquid assets | 98.28% | at least 20.00% | Pass |
| Ratio | Value | Threshold | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing debt | 64.05% | 33.33% | Fail |
| Cash + interest-bearing securities | 1.45% | 33.33% | Pass |
| Accounts receivable | 1.72% | 33.33% | Pass |
| Ratio | Value | Threshold | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing debt | 64.05% | 33.33% | Fail |
| Cash + interest-bearing securities | 1.45% | 33.33% | Pass |
| Accounts receivable | 1.72% | 50.00% | Pass |
ℹ️ Dow Jones Islamic Market, MSCI M-Series, S&P Shariah divide by a trailing-average market cap (24- or 36-month) rather than today's. That price history is not collected for non-US listings, so these are reported as unverified — it reflects a missing input on our side, not anything about the company.
Research only, not investment advice. Thresholds are each standard-setter's published limits; a ratio marked “at least” is a floor, not a ceiling.
Verdict history for MLECE.PA. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
Tracked since 2026-09-07.
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR applies published screening standards to a company's own filings and shows the result under each one. It is research, not a religious ruling. For a ruling that applies to you, ask a qualified scholar.
Because they measure different things. Some divide interest-bearing debt by market cap, others by total assets, and the thresholds differ too. The same filing can clear one line and cross another. HTR shows every verdict rather than averaging them into one label.
Ratios are recomputed when a new filing lands, and the whole watchlist is re-screened on a rolling basis. The date on the verdict above is the last time this symbol was actually recomputed, not the last time the page was built.
If a company earns some non-permissible income, many scholars hold that the same share of any dividend should be given away. The non-permissible income figure above is the number that calculation starts from — the purification calculator finishes it, showing the filing figures behind the ratio and both the proportional and the AAOIFI per-share convention.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.