Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment MBLCX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Madison Diversified Income Fund · MADISON FUNDS
15 holdings
UNVERIFIED Only 0% of this fund's holdings matched a company we have independently screened — below the 70% floor needed to state a verdict.
15 holdings, 5 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-17. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Dividend Value ETF | UNSCREENED | 21.66% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | UNSCREENED | 17.76% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | UNSCREENED | 16.80% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Madison Covered Call ETF | UNSCREENED | 11.77% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | UNSCREENED | 10.97% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | UNSCREENED | 8.40% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| VanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | UNSCREENED | 6.27% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Global X MLP ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.41% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | UNSCREENED | 2.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| State Street Global Advisors | UNSCREENED | 1.26% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fannie Mae | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Government National Mortgage Association | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Government National Mortgage Association | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Freddie Mac | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fannie Mae | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Madison Dividend Value ETFnot matched to a ticker | 21.66% | Not screened |
| Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETFnot matched to a ticker | 17.76% | Not screened |
| Madison Aggregate Bond ETFnot matched to a ticker | 16.80% | Not screened |
| Madison Covered Call ETFnot matched to a ticker | 11.77% | Not screened |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETFnot matched to a ticker | 10.97% | Not screened |
| Schwab US Dividend Equity ETFnot matched to a ticker | 8.40% | Not screened |
| VanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETFnot matched to a ticker | 6.27% | Not screened |
| Global X MLP ETFnot matched to a ticker | 3.41% | Not screened |
| iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFnot matched to a ticker | 2.00% | Not screened |
| State Street Global Advisorsnot matched to a ticker | 1.26% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 15 holdings, 100.3% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
Verdict history for MBLCX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 2 days - this is not a reading of today
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.