Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment MAPP's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
22 holdings
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 22 holdings are companies in our screened equity universe. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not apply to a fund holding bonds, sukuk or other instruments — this is not a gap in our data about the fund.
Largest holdings: iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF, Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF, Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.
22 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-04-30, filed 2026-06-26. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Verdict history for MAPP. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
Tracked since 2026-09-07.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Not enough completed daily bars to compute pivots.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 35.28 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -64.72 | NEUTRAL |
| ROC (10) | -1.33 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.38 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 28.02 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 28.12 | SELL |
| EMA (20) | 28.14 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 28.14 | SELL |
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.