Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment ITDF's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF ETF · iShares Trust
13 holdings · as of 2026-07-31 (2.4 months ago)
This fund holds short positions, so exposure is counted gross — long and short both count as exposure rather than netting off, and the weights below therefore sum to 105% of net assets rather than 100%. Shares of the portfolio are shown as shares of that gross exposure.
UNVERIFIED Only 1% of this fund's holdings matched a company we have independently screened — below the 70% floor needed to state a verdict.
13 holdings, 2 matched (1% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-23. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| iShares Russell 1000 ETF | UNSCREENED | 53.09% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Core MSCI International Developed Mkt ETF | UNSCREENED | 24.51% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | UNSCREENED | 10.66% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BlackRock Funds III: BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional; SL Agency Shares | UNSCREENED | 4.66% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corp Bond ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.85% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Core US REIT ETF | UNSCREENED | 2.68% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares MBS ETF | UNSCREENED | 0.53% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.48% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF | UNSCREENED | 0.42% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares US Treasury Bond ETF | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.33% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares 5-10 Yr Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF | UNSCREENED | 0.27% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BlackRock Funds III: BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury; SL Agency Shares | UNSCREENED | 0.16% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Methodology breakdown computing — it will appear here on its own.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
The factors behind the read, each shown with the figure it rests on, including the ones pointing the other way.
Computing the full ratio and business-activity breakdown for ITDF — this runs off the critical path so the page paints first. It will appear here on its own.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 51.20 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 60.63 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | 32.86 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -39.37 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.01 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | -0.18 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.08 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 41.92 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 41.84 | BUY |
| EMA (20) | 41.94 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 41.89 | BUY |
| EMA (30) | 41.95 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 42.00 | BUY |
| EMA (50) | 41.88 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 42.13 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 41.36 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 41.63 | BUY |
| EMA (200) | 40.00 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 40.02 | BUY |
The fund is actively managed and allocates and reallocates its assets among a combination of underlying funds in proportions based on its own investment strategy.
Background via Yahoo Finance — informational, not part of the verdict.
Good setup, solid confluence
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
| Timeframe | Bias | Bars |
|---|---|---|
| 📅 Daily | BEARISH | 42 |
| 🕐 1H | NEUTRAL | 21 |
| ⏱ 15-Min | RANGING | 86 |
| ⏲ 5-Min | BULLISH | 234 |
Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.
How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.
Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Insider transactions reported in the last ninety days. Insiders sell for reasons that have nothing to do with a view, so a sale on its own is not a signal.
NO DATA 0 buys · 0 sells
The weekly CFTC Commitments of Traders report for the broad market it tracks, not for this symbol. Positioning context for the tape — it says nothing about this company.
NEUTRAL report date 2026-10-06 · Asset managers net 906615 (+2612)
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.