Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment HFGM's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF ETF · Tidal Trust I
34 holdings · as of 2026-05-31 (4.4 months ago) The fund may have traded since. SEC Form N-PORT is filed quarterly and lags the period it covers, so these are the most recent holdings on file, not the fund’s holdings today.
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 34 holdings are companies in our screened equity universe. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not apply to a fund holding bonds, sukuk or other instruments — this is not a gap in our data about the fund.
Largest holdings: First American Government Obli, Vanguard Emerging Markets Gove, iShares MSCI China ETF, N/A, N/A.
34 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-05-31, filed 2026-07-29. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Government Obli | UNSCREENED | 64.70% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard Emerging Markets Gove | UNSCREENED | 7.49% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares MSCI China ETF | UNSCREENED | 7.46% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 1.58% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.93% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.67% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.65% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.53% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.44% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.35% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.32% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.28% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.22% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.22% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.18% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.17% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.17% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.16% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.15% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.15% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.15% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.11% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.10% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.08% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Methodology breakdown computing — it will appear here on its own.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
The factors behind the read, each shown with the figure it rests on, including the ones pointing the other way.
Computing the full ratio and business-activity breakdown for HFGM — this runs off the critical path so the page paints first. It will appear here on its own.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 50.60 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 51.75 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | -14.95 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -48.25 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | -0.03 | SELL |
| ROC (10) | -0.95 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.31 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 31.70 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 31.62 | BUY |
| EMA (20) | 31.71 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 31.78 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 31.69 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 31.76 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 31.65 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 31.59 | BUY |
| EMA (100) | 31.65 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 31.58 | BUY |
| EMA (200) | 31.50 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 32.14 | SELL |
The fund manager seeks to create an investment portfolio with similar return characteristics to the gross of fees returns of the hedge fund industry’s Global Macro sector, while also targeting a volatility level approximately twice that of the sector. The fund’s portfolio will generally consist of long and short positions in 10-30 Underlying ETFs and futures contracts. The fund is non-diversified.
Background via Yahoo Finance — informational, not part of the verdict.
Average — needs more confirmation before sizing up
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
| Timeframe | Bias | Bars |
|---|---|---|
| 📅 Daily | BEARISH | 41 |
| 🕐 1H | NEUTRAL | 32 |
| ⏱ 15-Min | BEARISH | 129 |
| ⏲ 5-Min | BULLISH | 234 |
Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.
How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.
Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Still fetching insider filings — it ran past this page's budget, so the page painted without waiting. The fetch is still running; reload in a moment and it will be here.
The weekly CFTC Commitments of Traders report for the broad market it tracks, not for this symbol. Positioning context for the tape — it says nothing about this company.
NEUTRAL report date 2026-10-06 · Asset managers net 906615 (+2612)
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.