Whether this company clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Methodology breakdown not tracked for GLPGF in this view. The verdict above is our compliance provider's, unchanged.
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Galapagos NV (GLPGF) is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per our secondary compliance provider (last assessed 2026-08-25). See the full ratio breakdown and business-activity screen below for the reasoning.
⚠️ Financial ratios are only half the screen. A company whose core business is in an excluded sector — weapons/defense, alcohol, gambling, conventional (interest-based) finance, tobacco, pork, or adult entertainment — is non-compliant even if every debt and income ratio passes. So passing ratios below don't override this verdict; check the business-activity screen for the reason.
Not tracked for GLPGF in this view — our own seven-methodology breakdown is not on this page. The verdict above is our compliance provider's, unchanged and not affected by this.
Verdict history for GLPGF. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
Tracked since 2026-09-07.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 0.00 | BUY |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 50.00 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -50.00 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.05 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Momentum (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (10) | 26.24 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 26.24 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (20) | 26.31 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 26.24 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (30) | 26.46 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 26.24 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (50) | 26.83 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 26.90 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 27.82 | SELL |
| SMA (100) | 27.49 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 29.69 | SELL |
| SMA (200) | 29.94 | SELL |
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
No. HTR applies published screening standards to a company's own filings and shows the result under each one. It is research, not a religious ruling. For a ruling that applies to you, ask a qualified scholar.
Because they measure different things. Some divide interest-bearing debt by market cap, others by total assets, and the thresholds differ too. The same filing can clear one line and cross another. HTR shows every verdict rather than averaging them into one label.
Ratios are recomputed when a new filing lands, and the whole watchlist is re-screened on a rolling basis. The date on the verdict above is the last time this symbol was actually recomputed, not the last time the page was built.
If a company earns some non-permissible income, many scholars hold that the same share of any dividend should be given away. The non-permissible income figure above is the number that calculation starts from.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.