ABIMXETF / FundAB Impact Municipal Income Shares
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment ABIMX's does — no target price to set, unlike a price alert.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
AB Impact Municipal Income Shares · AB CORPORATE SHARES
273 holdings
This fund holds short positions, so exposure is counted gross — long and short both count as exposure rather than netting off, and the weights below therefore sum to 101% of net assets rather than 100%. Shares of the portfolio are shown as shares of that gross exposure.
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 273 holdings are companies in our screened equity universe. Our look-through screens equities, so it does not apply to a fund holding bonds, sukuk or other instruments — this is not a gap in our data about the fund.
Largest holdings: California Community Choice Financing Authority, California Community Choice Financing Authority, California Community Choice Financing Authority, California Community Choice Financing Authority, Chicago Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Fund.
273 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-24. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
All holdings (273) · showing 251–273
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of Bridgeport CT | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| California Municipal Finance Authority | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| California School Finance Authority | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| St Louis Community College District | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Build NYC Resource Corp | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Dakota County Community Development Agency | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Flint Hospital Building Authority | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| LCH Ltd. | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Screened on its holdings, not its name
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 3.15% | Not screened |
| California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.80% | Not screened |
| California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.76% | Not screened |
| California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.70% | Not screened |
| Chicago Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Fundnot matched to a ticker | 1.70% | Not screened |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.68% | Not screened |
| Maryland Economic Development Corpnot matched to a ticker | 1.68% | Not screened |
| California Municipal Finance Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.49% | Not screened |
| Maryland Economic Development Corpnot matched to a ticker | 1.49% | Not screened |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authoritynot matched to a ticker | 1.35% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 273 holdings, 17.8% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
What holds the number back
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
- California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot screened3.15%
- California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot screened1.80%
- California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot screened1.76%
- California Community Choice Financing Authoritynot screened1.70%
- Chicago Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Fundnot screened1.70%
- Metropolitan Transportation Authoritynot screened1.68%
What changed, and when
Verdict history for ABIMX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for ABIMX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 3 days - this is not a reading of today
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
Price Forecast
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Technical Summary
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Every indicator, and what it reads
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 71.00 | SELL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 81.82 | SELL |
| CCI (20) | 100.36 | SELL |
| Williams %R (14) | -18.18 | SELL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.02 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | 1.73 | BUY |
| Momentum (10) | 0.16 | BUY |
| EMA (10) | 9.34 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 9.34 | BUY |
| EMA (20) | 9.27 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 9.25 | BUY |
| EMA (30) | 9.24 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 9.15 | BUY |
| EMA (50) | 9.24 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 9.16 | BUY |
| EMA (100) | 9.30 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 9.35 | BUY |
| EMA (200) | 9.35 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 9.42 | SELL |
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.