57 Electronic Components issuers carry a screening verdict, out of 106 issuers we hold in this industry. Verdicts come from two independent engines and each row says which.
50 screened by our own engine against published ratio methodologies computed from primary filings · 9 carrying a reviewed third-party provider verdict.
Classified under Technology, which is where 105 of these issuers sit — 1 are filed under a different sector by their provider.
The seven standards HTR computes reach different verdicts on 52 of the 86 Electronic Components issuers that more than one of them can decide — 60%.
A split is one issuer at least one standard passes and at least one fails. Why they disagree is mostly the denominator each standard measures debt against, not the ceiling.
Compliant first, then alphabetical. Every row links to that issuer's full ratio breakdown, business-activity screen and the filing behind it.
| Issuer | Verdict | Screened | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6768.T Tamura Corporation | NON-COMPLIANT | 2026-08-27 | in-house |
| TMPOQ TMPOQ | NO VERDICT | — | not screened yet |
| TTG.L TT Electronics plc | NON-COMPLIANT | 2026-08-27 | in-house |
| USPCY USPCY | NO VERDICT | — | not screened yet |
| BN2.SI Valuetronics Holdings Limited | NON-COMPLIANT | 2026-08-28 | in-house |
| 000670.KS Young Poong Corporation | NON-COMPLIANT | 2026-08-27 | in-house |