Skip to main content
US EQUITIES CLOSED CRYPTO 24/7
HALAL TRADING ROOM Sharia-screened signals
TERMINAL
4,425
Companies they disagree on
27.0%
Of those both can decide
1,402
MSCI Islamic M-Series passes, FTSE Shariah does not
3,023
FTSE Shariah passes, MSCI Islamic M-Series does not
Where the difference comes from
MSCI Islamic M-SeriesFTSE Shariah
Debt ceiling 33.33% 33.33%
Measured against 36-month average market cap total assets
Issuers passing 5,134 12,847
Could not establish 28,754 14,617

These differ on both levers: the ceiling (33.33% against 33.33%) and, more importantly, the denominator (36-month average market cap against total assets).

A company whose market capitalisation halves has a debt ratio that doubles under a market-cap standard and does not move at all under an asset-based one — nothing about the business changed, but the verdict did. How often each lever is the one that splits a pair is measured across every pair here.

Companies they split on

Real issuers from HTR's corpus. Open any of them for the ratio each verdict rests on — which is the thing that makes a disagreement checkable rather than merely stated.

Passes MSCI Islamic M-Series, fails FTSE Shariah · 12 of 1,402

OONEF · YMT · ILAG · ADDHY · FTAI · REFR · NMTC · TAYD · ZTS · NXL · MU · ACFN

Passes FTSE Shariah, fails MSCI Islamic M-Series · 12 of 3,023

YZOFF · PFE · PREM · ACB · CGC · IART · NOV · DVN · PPIH · EML · SEG · VSH

Neither one is the right answer

HTR does not have a view on which of these two standards you should follow. They are both published, both applied by real index providers, and both defensible — they simply define the question differently. Which definition applies to you is a matter for your own scholarship.

What HTR can do is compute both honestly, show you where they part company, and never hide the split behind a single blended score.

Other pairs that disagree most